Michael Dean :: Blog :: Archives

November 2009

November 03, 2009

All very well Johnson admitting that Labour have 'made mistakes' on immigration policy!Surprised

But New Labour's real failure is in almost every area of government  in that they completely FAILED to listen to any one else and implemented policies that were obviously going to fail!!
Brown and New Labour would appear to have no officials or 'experts' who are prepared to tell their bosses of potential problems with their policies.
Perhaps Brown and New Labour really believed that only employing 'yes' men and women would be beneficial to them!!
Whatever the reason is, this government has consistently implemented policies that have simply failed to work (and been very expensive).

All very well Johnson admitting that Labour have 'made mistakes' on immigration policy!

But New Labour's real failure is in almost every area of government  in that they completely FAILED to listen to any one else and implemented policies that were obviously going to fail!!

Brown and New Labour would appear to have no officials or 'experts' who are prepared to tell their bosses of potential problems with their policies. Perhaps Brown and New Labour really believed that only employing 'yes' men and women would be beneficial to them!!

Whatever the reason is, this government has consistently implemented policies that have simply failed to work (and been very expensive). They have consistently introduced computer systems that fail to achieve their aims (and end up being dumped or rewritten).They have consistently announced policies that failed to work.

There does seem to have been a 'hidden agenda' with New labour's immigration policies.  It would seem to be that their failure to manage immigration was in fact what the government wanted!

Did Brown really need to introduce policies to solve the credit crunch problems which would seem to have resulted in bigger, but different, problems for the UK!

Obviously some of what Brown has done regarding the credit crunch was needed. But was it really a rational choice to put the UK into such massive debt? It is beginning to look like the medicine may have cured the patient but, unfortunately, the patient died from the effects of the medicine!

Keywords: brown, immigration, labour, new labour, policies, recession

Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)

November 06, 2009

It seems to me that Brown is very, very confused about the reasons why the war in Afghanistan is going on.

He has said today:

'we cannot, must not and will not walk away as long as Al-Qaeda continues to plot attacks on Britain from the region'

What region is this???

Does he mean Afghanistan? OR perhaps he means Iraq? or Pakistan? I am not aware of any group in Afghanistan plotting attacks on the UK.

Even if there were, there are Islamic extremists in many other countries of the world who may be plotting to attack the UK. ARE WE NOW GOING TO WAR AGAINST THEM!!

Pakistan should be a prime target for the UK IF Brown is concerned about Al-Qaeda plotting attacks on Britain!!

Brown has introduced other reasons for our involvement in the war in Afghanistan. This includes allowing women to be educated and other aspects of the way women are treated.  So is the UK now going to attack all countries which treat women like this? Some sort of crusade throughout the world against Islam perhaps?

The whole political thinking and strategy of this government is a complete mess! Just like the way that they run the UK! So no surprise there!

Keywords: Afghanistan, Al-Qaeda, brown, extremist, Islam, Islamic extremists, Pakistan, war

Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)

November 08, 2009

Gordon Brown said:

"I am naturally concerned that the taxpayer gets a fair deal - especially that the taxpayer gets a fair deal from the institutions that in the last year have benefited massively from support across the world."

So does Gordon Brown think that this is a fair deal for the taxpayers?

Borrowing billions of pounds in their name and expecting them to pay extra taxes for the next 25 years in order to pay the debts?

I just wonder how much would need to have been borrowed to prevent the closure of shops like Woolworths, which employed lots of people!!

And I have also said many times that these banks should not be allowed to get rid of any staff on a non-voluntary basis. They have been given billions of taxpayers money, yet are allowed to fire staff! This not only adds to the unemployment levels, brings the miseries of families losing homes, and removes yet more spending power by people in employment.

There does not appear to be any joined up thinking in the way that Brown and Darling are managing the UK economy!

Keywords: Brown, debt, employment, extra taxes, Gordon Brown, recession, taxpayer, taxpayers

Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)

November 13, 2009

It would seem obvious from the latest comments from Brown that he has finally understood that this war in the Middle East is wrong, was wrong from day one, that we cannot win and more and more of our soldiers will be killed or injured.
I was taken in by Blair (at first) when he claimed that we had to attack Iraq or they would attack us.
It wasn't the quality of his argument, it was that it simply did not occur to me that the prime minister of this country would lie to us about the potential threat by another country!

Fortunately I realised quite quickly that everything blair was saying was rubbish and I have not believed a word he has said since!
But Brown has kept us in this war, even subsequently attacking Afghanistan. He has failed to justify the war, giving differing reasons why we need to be in Afghanistan.
Now Brown appears to have changed his mind and is working on exit strategies (which can be seen as meaning that the reasons we are at war were not that important after all!).
So what has changed to mean that Brown is now not firmly sticking to his stated position that this war is important to the UK?
I would suggest that nothing has changed. Except that we have an election coming up soon and Brown knows that he is not popular!
All that money wasted in these wars, let alone the lives lost and the lives blighted by injuries. We have an election coming up and Gordon Brown is changing his priorities!

Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)

November 21, 2009

The Home Secretary Alan Johnson is apparently saying that the police should visit every crime victim.

This is an amazing statement and confirms what the people in the UK already know. This is simply that the police do not bother with investigating every crime that takes place. Because if they did, then the police would already be visiting every crime victim!

The police are not bothering to investigate a huge amount of the crime that takes place. We know from the media that the police refuse to turn up on many occasions, especially for ‘low level’ crime such as yobs smashing up property and fighting on the streets. Any crimes involving credit cards are now simply ignored.

Yes, Brown is employing more police but they seem to spend most of their time back in the police station filling in reports! 

I am cynical enough about this government to wonder if so much of this ‘low level’ crime is deliberately being ignored in order to reduce the crime figures!

The same applies to the police issuing fixed penalty notices for a range of public order offences. I would guess that these offences are not included in the crime figures because no prosecution takes place!

Labour’s failure to build prisons in advance of when they would be required means that we do not have the prison places required. The answer that this government appears to have come up with is to ignore a lot of the crime going on in the streets.

Keywords: crime, criminals, david cameron, gordon brown, government, police, policing policy

Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)

November 25, 2009

This court case was never addressing the main issue.

It is not the principle of having penalties for going overdrawn, it is the AMOUNT of penalty that these greedy and grasping banks are taking.

The very concept of a FIXED penalty is the problem. These penalties are set up to penalise the poorest and weakest in our society.

This incompetent Labour government did a huge amount of damage by closing post offices and forcing many people to have benefits, pensions etc paid into bank accounts. They did not understand the consequences of this action, all they could see were cost saving!

People on low incomes should NOT be forced to have a bank account. They are the least able to manage bank accounts and the ones who suffer the most when things go wrong.

Many elderly, sick and low paid workers only have £50 a week available to pay ALL their bills. The moment they get charged £30 plus, their accounts go out of control and they end up owing the banks hundreds of pounds.

Penalty charges MUST be PROPORTIONAL to income.

We cannot have a situation where the money paid to the poorest people in our society and which they need to live on is taken by the banks to increase their profits and add to the bonuses paid to the senior staff!!

Our prime minister did not bother listening to those who forecast exactly what would happen if the government persisted in forcing people to open bank accounts. Gordon Brown made the wrong decision, as usual, and the poorest people in the UK are the ones who are hit the hardest!

Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)