You can filter this page to certain types of posts:
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)
Keywords: Brown, Gordon Brown, minister, pm, prime minister, uk
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)
A lot of people accepted that the war was necessary because the Prime Minister of the UK said that it was necessary.
They were being misled by Blair, Brown and New Labour but that dues not mean that they were wrong to put the safety of the citizens of the UK as their first priority!
I have a problem with the Lib Dems voting against a war which we were told was necessary for the security and safety of the people of the UK.
If Blair was telling the truth about the need for war then the Lib Dems were not putting the security of the UK as their first priority!
The fact that Blair, Brown and New Labour were misleading us about the importance of war to defend our country, does not detract from the fact that the Liberal Democrats chose not to take steps to protect the UK from being targeted by Iraq.
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)
I heard Brown yesterday say that he would stay as PM if he was re-elected. He seems to have forgotten that he was never elected as PM in the first place.
Brown is a very good example of the dangers and folly of allowing anyone positions of authority over a country without being elected by the people. If people get a chance to elect someone who turns out to be useless, then they have no one to blame but themselves. That is the way the system works.
But Brown was not elected.
That is the main reason, in my view, why people are so against New Labour now that Brown has taken the UK from an economy in a really good position (remember the Golden Inheritance of the last Conservative government?) and almost bankrupted the UK and leaving us with debts that will take twenty years of austerity to pay off!
Brown has messed up this country big-time! And he was not elected by the people, he was foisted on us by this Labour government. Both will take the blame for the mess that the economy and the country is in.
Keywords: economy, elected, election, leader, New Labour, pm
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)
This court case was never addressing the main issue.
It is not the principle of having penalties for going overdrawn, it is the AMOUNT of penalty that these greedy and grasping banks are taking.
The very concept of a FIXED penalty is the problem. These penalties are set up to penalise the poorest and weakest in our society.
This incompetent Labour government did a huge amount of damage by closing post offices and forcing many people to have benefits, pensions etc paid into bank accounts. They did not understand the consequences of this action, all they could see were cost saving!
People on low incomes should NOT be forced to have a bank account. They are the least able to manage bank accounts and the ones who suffer the most when things go wrong.
Many elderly, sick and low paid workers only have £50 a week available to pay ALL their bills. The moment they get charged £30 plus, their accounts go out of control and they end up owing the banks hundreds of pounds.
Penalty charges MUST be PROPORTIONAL to income.
We cannot have a situation where the money paid to the poorest people in our society and which they need to live on is taken by the banks to increase their profits and add to the bonuses paid to the senior staff!!
Our prime minister did not bother listening to those who forecast exactly what would happen if the government persisted in forcing people to open bank accounts. Gordon Brown made the wrong decision, as usual, and the poorest people in the UK are the ones who are hit the hardest!
Keywords: bank, benefits, Brown, Cameron, charges, Conservatives, council tax, credit crunch, energy bills, financial, greed, Labour, labour, overdraft, overdrawn, recession, UK Economy
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)
The Home Secretary Alan Johnson is apparently saying that the police should visit every crime victim.
This is an amazing statement and confirms what the people in the UK already know. This is simply that the police do not bother with investigating every crime that takes place. Because if they did, then the police would already be visiting every crime victim!
The police are not bothering to investigate a huge amount of the crime that takes place. We know from the media that the police refuse to turn up on many occasions, especially for ‘low level’ crime such as yobs smashing up property and fighting on the streets. Any crimes involving credit cards are now simply ignored.
Yes, Brown is employing more police but they seem to spend most of their time back in the police station filling in reports!
I am cynical enough about this government to wonder if so much of this ‘low level’ crime is deliberately being ignored in order to reduce the crime figures!
The same applies to the police issuing fixed penalty notices for a range of public order offences. I would guess that these offences are not included in the crime figures because no prosecution takes place!
Labour’s failure to build prisons in advance of when they would be required means that we do not have the prison places required. The answer that this government appears to have come up with is to ignore a lot of the crime going on in the streets.
Keywords: crime, criminals, david cameron, gordon brown, government, police, policing policy
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)
Keywords: afghanistan, credit crunch, election, government, iraq war, recession, UK Economy, war
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)
Gordon Brown said:
"I am naturally concerned that the taxpayer gets a fair deal - especially that the taxpayer gets a fair deal from the institutions that in the last year have benefited massively from support across the world."
So does Gordon Brown think that this is a fair deal for the taxpayers?
Borrowing billions of pounds in their name and expecting them to pay extra taxes for the next 25 years in order to pay the debts?
I just wonder how much would need to have been borrowed to prevent the closure of shops like Woolworths, which employed lots of people!!
And I have also said many times that these banks should not be allowed to get rid of any staff on a non-voluntary basis. They have been given billions of taxpayers money, yet are allowed to fire staff! This not only adds to the unemployment levels, brings the miseries of families losing homes, and removes yet more spending power by people in employment.
There does not appear to be any joined up thinking in the way that Brown and Darling are managing the UK economy!
Keywords: Brown, debt, employment, extra taxes, Gordon Brown, recession, taxpayer, taxpayers
Posted by Michael Dean | 0 comment(s)